BAR EXAM
| LAW LINKS | OTHER LINKS | STUDY ADVICE
PROFESSORS
& OUTLINES | SITE
CONTACT INFO | MISCELLANEOUS
Aaron Bruhl
Civil Procedure,
Statutory Interpretation
Civil
Procedure Outline 2011 – anonymous – Grade A - added
05-27-2012
Civil
Procedure Outline 2011 – anonymous added 05-27-2012
Statutory
Interpretation Outline - Grade A minus - (cheat
sheet style) added 07/06/2010
Civ Pro Outline, contributed anonymous added 09-04-2008
Civil Procedure
Outline - anonymous added 04-23-2008
The following review was submitted
anonymously in May 2008:
I had Aaron Bruhl for Civil Procedure in the summer 2007. It was the
first class I took in law school and it might have been one of the first
classes he taught at UHLC. He is a super intellectual guy - very nice,
quiet, and thoughtful. He was always on time and well prepared and would insert
humor in his lectures at very unexpected times.
He wore a suit and tie for every class, but wears
jeans and vans when he's not teaching. He divided the class up on the first
day, alphabetically, and would randomly call on anyone within the assigned
group each day for questions over the assigned reading. Many times he asked for
volunteers but eventually, you're going to get called on. So although I
wouldn't recommend getting behind, you only had to be really prepared every 6th
or 7th class, and you knew when that day was from the
schedule. He was very responsive to questions and didn't mind saying if he
wasn't sure about something. He would always come back with an answer the next
class. I don't think we had to stand up when we answered. He did get a
little riled (which meant he issued a very polite mandate) about a student that
set up a desk recorder. So don't try that. He gave us a practice exam
about half way through the semester so we could see what his tests would be
like - and then he went over it in class, including the scope and detail of the
answers he expected. I know when I did the practice test,
I didn't time it (as suggested) and thought I would never get through it.
Don't be afraid to talk to him about your practice exam in a scheduled meeting.
The final exam was all essay, open book (text and FRCP), and it seems like you
could use your own outline - but not a commercially prepared one. In the
final you needed to be able to spot issues - he expected very detailed answers.
He recommended Glannon's supplement and I found it to
be very helpful. Overall, he was a very good professor and I wouldn't hesitate
to take another class from him.